On The Neurath-Horkheimer debate: Science and Politics

Main Article Content

Carolina Inés Araujo
Celia G. Medina

Abstract

In this work we will summarize the Neurath-Horkheimer debate as an example of the recovery of the Vienna Circle’s political aspects that were forgotten in the traditional view, so as to achieve a better understanding of the different positions assumed by the Circle’s members. Our intention is to show that much of this debate stems from their political differences and the contenders’ diverse conceptions of philosophy, science and reason, but not from the lack of political interests in Neurath and the Vienna Circle.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Araujo, C. I., & Medina, C. G. (2014). On The Neurath-Horkheimer debate: Science and Politics. DIÁNOIA, 59(72), 113–129. https://doi.org/10.21898/dia.v59i72.98
Section
Discusiones y notas
Author Biographies

Carolina Inés Araujo

Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Argentina

Celia G. Medina

Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Argentina
PLUMX Metrics