Pedro Stepanenko, A reply to the comments on Categorías y autoconciencia en Kant
Main Article Content
Abstract
The author of Categorías y autoconciencia en Kant replies here to the remarks by I. Cabrera, E. Lazos and G. Leyva that are included in this volume. In response to the latter, the author characterises his interpretation of the Kantian deduction of categories as a reconstruction of a discussion between different positions, and expresses his distrust of a systematic reconstruction of all its parts. In response to Lazos, he analyses the different concepts of objectivity used by Kant in the transcendental deduction that lead to the problem of subjective representations. In his answer to Cabrera, he explains the sense in which the so-called subjective deduction can be seen as an analytic-regressive argument, and why the concept of self-consciousness as a self-ascription of representations is not useful in arguing for the necessity of categories.
Downloads
Article Details
The author is required to sign a letter for the transferal of rights, and to authorize the distribution of his or her article through any format.
The reproduction of articles —but not of images—is permitted, provided the source is cited and the authors’ rights respected.
Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivar 4.0 Internacional.