How to Evaluate Judicial Reasoning
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article deals with the question of how to evaluate justificatory judicial reasoning. To this end, the author clarifies the meaning of the one-right-answer thesis, identifies a variety of criteria of correctness, and gives special attention to the ideas of universality, coherence, (good) consequences, social and critical morality, and reasonability.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
Atienza, M. (2011). How to Evaluate Judicial Reasoning. DIÁNOIA, 56(67), 113–134. https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704913e.2011.67.173
Issue
Section
Discusiones y notas
The author is required to sign a letter for the transferal of rights, and to authorize the distribution of his or her article through any format.
The reproduction of articles —but not of images—is permitted, provided the source is cited and the authors’ rights respected.
Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivar 4.0 Internacional.
