Pragmatic Force and Language’s Institutional Character: Between Communicative Action and Symbolic Power

Main Article Content

Javier Alegre

Abstract

By using as a background Wittgenstein’s and Austin’s reflections

about language, the aim of this paper is to compare the way Habermas and

Bourdieu rebuild that original pragmatic perspective. I am specifically interested

in analyzing how the institutional character of language is retrieved by

Habermas’s communicative action theory and Bourdieu’s sociological pragmatic,

in order to show and to confront two different and irreducible ways of

appropriating the heuristic power of the pragmatic turn started by Wittgenstein

and Austin in the middle of the twentieth century.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Alegre, J. (2017). Pragmatic Force and Language’s Institutional Character: Between Communicative Action and Symbolic Power. DIÁNOIA, 62(79), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704913e.2017.79.1506
Section
Articles
PLUMX Metrics